اوپنایآی
@deredleritt3r
مدل داخلی جدید اوپنایآی زده تو کار ریاضیات سنگین و چنان خلاقیت پژوهشی از خودش نشون داده که کف ریاضیدانهای کلهگنده بریده




مدل داخلی جدید اوپنایآی زده تو کار ریاضیات سنگین و چنان خلاقیت پژوهشی از خودش نشون داده که کف ریاضیدانهای کلهگنده بریده. این غول جدید مسائلی مثل حدس بارنت و معادلات پیچیده ناویه-استوکس رو با خلق تکنیکهای کاملاً بکر حل کرده؛ طوری که دانشمندی مثل باکمستر اعتراف کرده هوش مصنوعی راهکاری داده که خودش ده سال آزگار دنبالش سگدو زده و بهش نرسیده بود. جالبتر اینکه حل این معماهای تاریخی برای سیستم فقط حدود سه ساعت تفکر سنگین ماشینی برده که نهایتاً چند صد دلار بیشتر خرج رو دستشون نذاشته. خلاصه اینکه مدل دیگه طوطیوار از روی دست مقالههای قبلی کپی نمیکنه و رسماً به درک و نبوغ علمی دست پیدا کرده.
منبع
prinz@deredleritt3r
OpenAI's internal model clearly has "research taste" in math - i.e., the final component we need to get to RSI.
- jboggan (post on Hacker News) on Barnette's Conjecture: "the 'aha' insight for this is actually f**ing wild... this is the first time I've seen complex roots and annihilating terms like this... I don't understand where this trick originated."
- Joshua Zelinsky on the proof that the chromatic number of the plane is at least six: "doesn't look like the method is a direction that the prior lit used to my knowledge... far beyond merelt building on existing methods or seeing connections between different problems."
and on two other problems (where he says he is only partly familiar with the literature): "not remotely low-hanging fruit... it seems like the AI is somehow inventing new techniques on its own."
These match Tristian Buckmaster's view on the Navier-Stokes solution: "you combine... ideas of convex integration with the growth mechanism of the Euler blowup, and... you create a new mechanism which is used to correct this non-solution. This is actually a cool idea. It's the kind of idea that I've been trying and failing to realize for over ten years... I didn't manage to do it... This is the leap."
The average amount of compute used to solve these problems was ~3 hours of Pro-level thinking.
And so, this means that OpenAI's internal model is able to generate truly novel discoveries in mathematics for... maybe at most a few hundred bucks?
If I were OpenAI, I would be asking this model to immediately target major unsolved problems in AI R&D.
۱۵ مهر ۱۴۰۵مشاهده در X
نظرها
هنوز نظری نیست.
بخش نظرها فعلاً در دسترس نیست.